﻿<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>BLOG.SPORTSLAWTALK.COM: Recent Comments</title><link>http://blog.sportslawtalk.com</link><description /><generator>Quick Blogcast</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:24:02 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title>Comment on Peter Roisman Interview</title><link>http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/2009/10/08/peter-roisman-interview.aspx#comment-2625907</link><dc:creator>software development in Surrey</dc:creator><description>Cool,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Keep up the good work,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for writing about it</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/2009/10/08/peter-roisman-interview.aspx#comment-2625907</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:21:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on David Glenn Interview, Part I</title><link>http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/2009/05/10/david-glenn-interview-part-i.aspx#comment-2578409</link><dc:creator>geeks</dc:creator><description>Quite inspiring,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is a great interview,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anyway, thanks for the post,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Keep up the good work,</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/2009/05/10/david-glenn-interview-part-i.aspx#comment-2578409</guid><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:07:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on It's Good To Be Fehr; Orrin Hatch Would Add A BCS Antitrust Probe To President Obama's Workload;NCAA Settles With Andy Oliver</title><link>http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/2009/10/21/its-good-to-be-fehr.aspx#comment-2556717</link><dc:creator>software developers</dc:creator><description>Nice post,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;People are pushin for there own interests and not that of the whole country,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anyway, thanks for the post.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Keep up the good work.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/2009/10/21/its-good-to-be-fehr.aspx#comment-2556717</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:14:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Association of Tennis Professionals</title><link>http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/2009/06/14/tennis.aspx#comment-2165532</link><dc:creator>Micaela</dc:creator><description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We have just added your latest post "Association of Tennis Professionals" to our &lt;a href="&lt;a href="http://www.sportstrove.info"&gt;http://www.sportstrove.info&lt;/a&gt;"&gt;Directory of Sports&lt;/a&gt;. You can check the inclusion of the post &lt;a href="http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/2009/06/14/tennis.aspx?ref=rss"&gt; here &lt;/a&gt; . We are delighted to invite you to submit all your future posts to the &lt;a href="&lt;a href="http://www.sportstrove.info"&gt;http://www.sportstrove.info&lt;/a&gt;"&gt;directory&lt;/a&gt; and get a huge base of visitors to your website.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Warm Regards&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sportstrove.info Team&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sportstrove.info"&gt;http://www.sportstrove.info&lt;/a&gt;</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/2009/06/14/tennis.aspx#comment-2165532</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:34:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on The Contract Between Universities To Play Football</title><link>http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/2009/04/21/the-contract-between-universities-to-play-football.aspx#comment-2017025</link><dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator><description>The damage clause in the Louisville-Duke contract was typical of the time in which the contract was signed but I don't believe it is as typical today. As a result of the several court cases that preceded the Cards-Devils, I think schools began to tighten up the language in order to avoid the problems created by inartful language of the Louisville-Duke contract. It should also be pointed out that the contract in question was drafted without the assistance of lawyers, and had lawyers been involved at the outset, the outcome would likely have been different.&lt;BR&gt; &lt;BR&gt;Buyouts remain the remedy of choice among colleges breaking contracts for athletic contests. The difference now is that the liquidated damage provision is more clearly spelled out and less open to differing interpretation.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/2009/04/21/the-contract-between-universities-to-play-football.aspx#comment-2017025</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:38:35 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>