﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title>BLOG.SPORTSLAWTALK.COM: Recent Comments</title>
	<updated>2010-03-16T12:20:57Z</updated>
	<id>http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/comments/atom.aspx</id>
	<link href="http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/comments/atom.aspx" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link href="http://blog.sportslawtalk.com" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<generator uri="http://app.onlinequickblog.com/" version="2.0">Quick Blogcast</generator>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Peter Roisman Interview</title>
		<link href="http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/2009/10/08/peter-roisman-interview.aspx#comment-2625907" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:blog.sportslawtalk.com,2009-12-08:2625907</id>
		<author>
			<name>software development in Surrey</name>
			<uri>http://www.geeks.ltd.uk/Services/software-product-development.html</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2009-12-08T12:21:21Z</updated>
		<published>2009-12-08T12:21:21Z</published>
		<content type="html">Cool,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Keep up the good work,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for writing about it</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on David Glenn Interview, Part I</title>
		<link href="http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/2009/05/10/david-glenn-interview-part-i.aspx#comment-2578409" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:blog.sportslawtalk.com,2009-11-20:2578409</id>
		<author>
			<name>geeks</name>
			<uri>http://www.geeks.ltd.uk/</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2009-11-20T13:07:22Z</updated>
		<published>2009-11-20T13:07:22Z</published>
		<content type="html">Quite inspiring,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is a great interview,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anyway, thanks for the post,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Keep up the good work,</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on It's Good To Be Fehr; Orrin Hatch Would Add A BCS Antitrust Probe To President Obama's Workload;NCAA Settles With Andy Oliver</title>
		<link href="http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/2009/10/21/its-good-to-be-fehr.aspx#comment-2556717" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:blog.sportslawtalk.com,2009-11-10:2556717</id>
		<author>
			<name>software developers</name>
			<uri>http://www.geeks.ltd.uk/Services.html</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2009-11-10T16:14:50Z</updated>
		<published>2009-11-10T16:14:50Z</published>
		<content type="html">Nice post,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;People are pushin for there own interests and not that of the whole country,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anyway, thanks for the post.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Keep up the good work.</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Association of Tennis Professionals</title>
		<link href="http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/2009/06/14/tennis.aspx#comment-2165532" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:blog.sportslawtalk.com,2009-06-15:2165532</id>
		<author>
			<name>Micaela</name>
			<uri>http://www.sportstrove.info</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2009-06-15T13:34:52Z</updated>
		<published>2009-06-15T13:34:52Z</published>
		<content type="html">Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We have just added your latest post "Association of Tennis Professionals" to our &lt;a href="&lt;a href="http://www.sportstrove.info"&gt;http://www.sportstrove.info&lt;/a&gt;"&gt;Directory of Sports&lt;/a&gt;. You can check the inclusion of the post &lt;a href="http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/2009/06/14/tennis.aspx?ref=rss"&gt; here &lt;/a&gt; . We are delighted to invite you to submit all your future posts to the &lt;a href="&lt;a href="http://www.sportstrove.info"&gt;http://www.sportstrove.info&lt;/a&gt;"&gt;directory&lt;/a&gt; and get a huge base of visitors to your website.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Warm Regards&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sportstrove.info Team&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sportstrove.info"&gt;http://www.sportstrove.info&lt;/a&gt;</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on The Contract Between Universities To Play Football</title>
		<link href="http://blog.sportslawtalk.com/2009/04/21/the-contract-between-universities-to-play-football.aspx#comment-2017025" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:blog.sportslawtalk.com,2009-04-24:2017025</id>
		<author>
			<name>Mark</name>
			<uri>http://thesportsbizblog.blogspot.com</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2009-04-24T06:38:35Z</updated>
		<published>2009-04-24T06:38:35Z</published>
		<content type="html">The damage clause in the Louisville-Duke contract was typical of the time in which the contract was signed but I don't believe it is as typical today. As a result of the several court cases that preceded the Cards-Devils, I think schools began to tighten up the language in order to avoid the problems created by inartful language of the Louisville-Duke contract. It should also be pointed out that the contract in question was drafted without the assistance of lawyers, and had lawyers been involved at the outset, the outcome would likely have been different.&lt;BR&gt; &lt;BR&gt;Buyouts remain the remedy of choice among colleges breaking contracts for athletic contests. The difference now is that the liquidated damage provision is more clearly spelled out and less open to differing interpretation.</content>
	</entry>
</feed>